Scholarly debate has persuasively highlighted the inherent tension between refugees and the modern state. Yet, how do state-refugee relations unfold in practice when considering the historical and social specificity of a single state? Is there a heuristic value in going beyond the premises of a general state-refugee binary and adopt a state-specific approach? These questions are addressed through an analysis based on the modelling of statehood in Lebanon and comparing five cases of refugee-state relations in this country. This method allows explaining the variation in degrees of segregation or integration of refugees and shows that the mode of politicization of refugees is the key factor in understanding this variation. Not all refugees and not all states are the same; the variance of state-refugee relations is best explained from a perspective that considers the historically situated nature of statehood.

中文翻译：

---

国家地位与难民：比较视角下的黎巴嫩难民人口融合与隔离模式

学术界的辩论有说服力地强调了难民与现代国家之间的内在张力。但是，考虑到单个国家的历史和社会特殊性，国家与难民之间的关系在实践中如何发展？超越一般的状态难民二进制文件的前提并采用特定于状态的方法是否有启发式的价值？这些问题是通过对黎巴嫩建国模式进行分析并比较该国五个难民与国家关系的案例而得到解决的。这种方法可以解释难民的隔离或融合程度的变化，并表明，难民政治化的模式是理解这种变化的关键因素。并非所有的难民，也不是所有的州都一样。