当前位置: X-MOL 学术Polis › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The meaning of Constitution. Brief review of the concept and its relevance in the light of principialism and garantism
Polis ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 , DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2018v14n1/gonzalez
Miguel González Madrid ,

Since ancient Greece, the Constitution has had different meanings and contents. This has not depended only on the diverse configuration of political institutions or on the inclusion in its text of clauses protecting rights and freedoms, but also on the protective scope and specific design of the guarantor system. All of this has involved the creation of systems of means of constitutional control and a re-dimensioning of the Constitution, to the point of concluding, at present, its supreme norm and parameter of validity of the entire legal order, especially in societies with full democracy. In this sense, this work raises the pertinence of considering the debate between the constitutionalist versions of principles and guarantees as an opportunity to strengthen the meaning of Constitution in terms of supreme norm that, simultaneously, limits the confines and the distribution of political power, Prevents and sanctions the excesses of power, gives effectiveness to the protection of rights, enhances the dignity of the human person, radiates coherence to the legal order and determines the parameters of validity of lower standards. Therefore, the borders between these constitutionalist versions can be softened in many points, which can be treated in an interchangeable way, although the question of the confrontation between law and morality persists as an obtuse zone that hinders or precludes the unification of contemporary constitutionalism.

中文翻译:

宪法的意义。从原则主义和反对主义的角度简要回顾这一概念及其相关性

自古希腊以来,《宪法》具有不同的含义和内容。这不仅取决于政治制度的多样化配置,也不取决于其保护权利和自由条款的内容,还取决于担保人制度的保护范围和具体设计。所有这些都涉及建立宪法控制手段体系和重新设定宪法的范围,以至目前得出的结论是,它的最高规范和整个法律秩序的有效性参数,特别是在拥有完整法律的社会中民主。从这个意义上讲,这项工作提出了考虑将宪政主义原则之间的辩论和担保作为在最高规范方面加强宪法意义的机会的考虑,而最高规范是同时 限制政治权力的范围和分配,防止和制裁过度权力,有效地保护权利,增强人的尊严,辐射法律秩序的连贯性,并确定较低标准的有效性参数。因此,尽管法治与道德之间的对立问题仍然是阻碍或阻止当代宪政主义统一的钝化区域,但宪政主义版本之间的界限可以在很多方面被软化,可以用可互换的方式来对待。辐射法律秩序的连贯性,并确定较低标准的有效性参数。因此,尽管法治与道德之间的对立问题仍然是阻碍或阻止当代宪政主义统一的钝化区域,但宪政主义版本之间的界限可以在很多方面被软化,可以用可互换的方式来对待。辐射法律秩序的连贯性,并确定较低标准的有效性参数。因此,尽管法治与道德之间的对立问题仍然是阻碍或阻止当代宪政主义统一的钝化区域,但宪政主义版本之间的界限可以在很多方面被软化,可以用可互换的方式来对待。
更新日期:2018-01-01
down
wechat
bug