Unsanctioned, unscripted, and seemingly “undesirable” activities have long appropriated urban spaces in routine and sometimes unexpected ways, bringing new meanings and unforeseen functions to those places. In the last decade or so, such practices have inspired a growing movement under the banner of DIY and tactical urbanisms. The growing acceptance of these practices creates important openings in the formalized planning systems for greater flexibility and expedient change. Yet, the institutionalization of previously informal and even subversive acts has resulted in concerns regarding co-optation and de-politicization. This special issue seeks to pivot a refocus towards these unsanctioned and unscripted urban activities as a form of counter-hegemonic spatial practices, distinct from its professionalized and institutionalized counterpart. A range of cases is examined here sharing similar characteristics as challenges against the prevailing social and political paradigm. Key findings include the scalability of guerrilla actions, the fluid shift between overt and covert actions, and the linkage between everyday struggles and organized resistance. This special issue is intended to advance our understanding of urban design by situating it in a broader social, economic, and political praxis that encompasses both formal and informal practices performed by a wide variety of individual and collective actors.

中文翻译：

---

游击城市主义：城市设计和抵抗实践

长期以来，未经批准、无脚本和看似“不受欢迎”的活动以例行且有时出人意料的方式占用了城市空间，为这些地方带来了新的意义和不可预见的功能。在过去十年左右的时间里，这种做法激发了一场以 DIY 和战术城市主义为旗帜的日益增长的运动。对这些做法的日益接受为正式的规划系统创造了重要的机会，以实现更大的灵活性和便利的变革。然而，以前非正式甚至颠覆性行为的制度化导致了对增选和去政治化的担忧。本期特刊旨在重新关注这些未经批准和无脚本的城市活动，作为一种反霸权的空间实践形式，与其专业化和制度化的对应物截然不同。这里审查了一系列案例，它们具有相似的特征，作为对流行的社会和政治范式的挑战。主要发现包括游击行动的可扩展性、公开和隐蔽行动之间的流动转变，以及日常斗争与有组织的抵抗之间的联系。本期特刊旨在通过将城市设计置于更广泛的社会、经济和政治实践中来增进我们对城市设计的理解，该实践包括由各种个人和集体参与者进行的正式和非正式实践。以及日常斗争和有组织的抵抗之间的联系。本期特刊旨在通过将城市设计置于更广泛的社会、经济和政治实践中来增进我们对城市设计的理解，该实践包括由各种个人和集体参与者进行的正式和非正式实践。以及日常斗争和有组织的抵抗之间的联系。本期特刊旨在通过将城市设计置于更广泛的社会、经济和政治实践中来增进我们对城市设计的理解，该实践包括由各种个人和集体参与者进行的正式和非正式实践。