This article was erroneously published in Volume 24, Issue 3 (2019) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41289-019-00086-6. The article is now included in the special issue “Guerrilla Urbanism”. Los Angeles has recently been the site of two notable cases of guerrilla urbanism. In one, street vendors formed advocacy groups and a coalition with allies that lobbied city council and overturned a citywide ban on their activity. In another, several Boyle Heights community organizations deployed confrontational tactics to close art events, galleries, and coffee shops to counter gentrification and displacement. This article compares these two cases to find the key role that urban aesthetics and design play in rewriting the dominant spatial order under contemporary conditions of immigrant urbanism. We propose that property outlaw theory from property rights law literature helps us understand the potentially productive role of guerrilla urbanism and its implications for urban design practice. Additionally, spatial and temporal parochialism, and defining the boundaries of what constitutes “the community” are important factors in the efficacy of guerrilla urbanism practice. These cases’ insights can help equip designers to more mindfully practice urban design, knowing the important role that aesthetics play in a larger property rights regime reconstruction project.

中文翻译：

---

更正：南地的财产不法分子：博伊尔高地艺术高档化和洛杉矶街头贩卖非刑事化案例中游击城市主义的潜力和局限性

本文错误地发表在第 24 卷第 3 期（2019 年）https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41289-019-00086-6。这篇文章现在收录在特刊“游击城市主义”中。洛杉矶最近成为两个著名的游击城市主义案例的发生地。其中之一，街头小贩与盟友组成了倡导团体和联盟，游说市议会并推翻全市范围内对其活动的禁令。在另一个博伊尔高地社区组织中，几个博伊尔高地社区组织部署了对抗性策略来关闭艺术活动、画廊和咖啡店，以对抗高档化和流离失所。本文比较这两个案例，以找出在当代移民城市化条件下，城市美学和设计在改写主导空间秩序中所起的关键作用。我们建议产权法文献中的财产违法理论有助于我们理解游击城市主义的潜在生产作用及其对城市设计实践的影响。此外，空间和时间的狭隘性以及界定构成“社区”的边界是影响游击城市主义实践有效性的重要因素。这些案例的见解可以帮助设计师更专注地实践城市设计，了解美学在更大的产权制度重建项目中的重要作用。界定什么构成“社区”的边界是影响游击城市化实践有效性的重要因素。这些案例的见解可以帮助设计师更专注地实践城市设计，了解美学在更大的产权制度重建项目中的重要作用。界定什么构成“社区”的边界是影响游击城市化实践有效性的重要因素。这些案例的见解可以帮助设计师更专注地实践城市设计，了解美学在更大的产权制度重建项目中的重要作用。