How should we understand the categorical distinction Aristotle draws between praxis and poesis? If this distinction gains its meaning only in a specific social and cultural context, what does this tell us about another famous Aristotelian distinction, namely, the distinction he draws between two types of justice: corrective and distributive? In particular, what is the orienting role of this distinction (and what should we make of this) in accounts of justice based on Kantian right and accounts based on Rawls’ principles of justice?

中文翻译：

---

马库斯二分法：纠正和分配正义

我们应该如何理解亚里士多德在实践和诗歌之间做出的绝对区分？如果这种区分仅在特定的社会和文化背景下才有意义，那么关于亚里士多德的另一个著名区分，即他在两种类型的正义之间做出的区分：矫正性和分配性，这告诉我们什么？特别是，在基于康德权利的正义解释和基于罗尔斯正义原则的解释中，这种区分（以及我们应该如何理解）的导向作用是什么？