This article consists of an original translation of Ernst Bloch’s 1923 review of Lukács History and Class Consciousness, preceded by a translator’s introduction contextualising Bloch’s review and interpreting what it tells us about the intellectual and personal relationship between Bloch and Lukács. I argue that Bloch’s review highlights some of the key differences and points of intersection between their thinking. Written when their personal relationship had already soured for both political and intellectual reasons, Bloch’s review makes clear his ongoing commitment to a form of utopianism Lukács had long abandoned. Unlike Lukács, who in History and Class Consciousness argued that the dialectical method could only be applied to the social realm, Bloch followed Engels in developing a dialectics of nature. However, even if Bloch was less willing to become involved in party politics than his erstwhile friend, as the review reveals, both men ultimately emphasised the present moment as the privileged locus of urgent political action.

中文翻译：

---

阿基米德点：卢卡奇和布洛赫的意识、实践和现在

本文由恩斯特·布洛赫 (Ernst Bloch) 1923 年对卢卡奇历史和阶级意识的评论的原始翻译组成，前面是一位译者的介绍，将布洛赫的评论置于语境中，并解释了它告诉我们关于布洛赫与卢卡奇之间的知识和个人关系的内容。我认为布洛赫的评论强调了他们思想之间的一些关键差异和交叉点。在他们的个人关系因政治和智力原因已经恶化时写的，布洛赫的评论清楚地表明他对卢卡奇长期放弃的一种乌托邦主义形式的持续承诺。与卢卡奇在《历史与阶级意识》中认为辩证法只能应用于社会领域不同，布洛赫跟随恩格斯发展了自然辩证法。然而，