Many philosophers argue that religious schools are guilty of indoctrinatory harm. I think they are right to be worried about that. But in this article, I will postulate that there are other harms for many individuals that are more severe outside the religious school. Accordingly the full scope of harm should be taken into account when evaluating the harm that some religious schools may do. Once we do that, I suggest, justice may require that we choose the lesser harm. To simplify matters, I focus my attention on the stigmatic harm done to Muslims, and the role that Islamic schools might be expected to play in mitigating that harm. If the full weight of stigmatic harm is factored into the ethical analysis concerning Islamic schools, then I suggest that there are sufficiently weighty pro tanto reasons for Muslim parents to prefer an Islamic school over the alternatives, notwithstanding the potential indoctrinatory harm.

中文翻译：

---

灌输、伊斯兰学校和更广泛的伤害范围

许多哲学家争辩说，宗教学校犯了教化式的伤害。我认为他们对此感到担忧是正确的。但在这篇文章中，我将假设，对于宗教学校之外的许多人来说，还有其他更严重的伤害。因此，在评估某些宗教学校可能造成的伤害时，应考虑到伤害的全部范围。我建议，一旦我们这样做了，正义可能会要求我们选择危害较小的。为了简化问题，我将注意力集中在对穆斯林造成的耻辱伤害上，以及伊斯兰学校在减轻这种伤害方面可能发挥的作用。如果在有关伊斯兰学校的伦理分析中考虑到耻辱伤害的全部分量，