当前位置: X-MOL 学术Teaching Public Administration › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Administering prevention or administering atrocities? Public affairs education in dark times
Teaching Public Administration ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-28 , DOI: 10.1177/0144739418824623
Nadia Rubaii 1 , Susan Appe 2 , Sebastian Lippez-De Castro 3
Affiliation  

Despite repeated calls to temper the bureaucratic ethos and its associated process-oriented pathologies with more of a democratic ethos grounded in normative values and the public interest, the practice, research, and teaching of public administration continues to largely perpetuate the former. In this paper we build upon the work of Camila Stivers’ book Governance in Dark Times and Nabatchi and colleagues’ subsequent call to search for opportunities to better address issues of war, terrorism, climate change, economic calamity, refugee crises, and other atrocities which characterize dark times. We focus our attention on one specific issue within this realm, that of genocides and mass atrocities, as a way to illustrate that public servants—from street-level bureaucrats through high-level policy makers—may be part of the problem or part of the solution. We assert the responsibility of public affairs educators to ensure that their students are prepared to administer prevention or we risk that traditional administrative pathologies may lead them to inadvertently engage in administering atrocities. We position our overarching proposal in the context of fundamental public service values as well as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16. We also align our more specific recommendations with the Network of Schools of Public Policy, Affairs, and Administration’s universal competencies and the core content domains of the Atlas for Public Management.

中文翻译:

实施预防还是实施暴行?黑暗时期的公共事务教育

尽管一再呼吁用更多基于规范价值观和公共利益的民主精神来缓和官僚主义精神及其相关的以过程为导向的病态,但公共行政的实践、研究和教学继续在很大程度上延续前者。在本文中,我们以 Camila Stivers 的著作《黑暗时代的治理》和 Nabatchi 及其同事随后呼吁寻找机会更好地解决战争、恐怖主义、气候变化、经济灾难、难民危机和其他暴行等问题的工作为基础。刻画黑暗时代。我们将注意力集中在这个领域内的一个特定问题上,即种族灭绝和大规模暴行,作为一种方式来说明公务员——从基层官僚到高层决策者——可能是问题的一部分或解决方案的一部分。我们主张公共事务教育工作者有责任确保他们的学生准备好进行预防,否则我们冒着传统行政病态可能导致他们无意中参与管理暴行的风险。我们将我们的总体提案置于基本公共服务价值观以及联合国可持续发展目标 (SDG),尤其是可持续发展目标 16 的背景下。我们还将更具体的建议与公共政策、事务和教育学院网络保持一致。行政部门的通用能力和公共管理地图集的核心内容领域。我们主张公共事务教育工作者有责任确保他们的学生准备好进行预防,否则我们冒着传统行政病态可能导致他们无意中参与管理暴行的风险。我们将我们的总体提案置于基本公共服务价值观以及联合国可持续发展目标 (SDG),尤其是可持续发展目标 16 的背景下。我们还将更具体的建议与公共政策、事务和教育学院网络保持一致。行政部门的通用能力和公共管理地图集的核心内容领域。我们主张公共事务教育工作者有责任确保他们的学生准备好进行预防,否则我们冒着传统行政病态可能导致他们无意中参与管理暴行的风险。我们将我们的总体提案置于基本公共服务价值观以及联合国可持续发展目标 (SDG),尤其是可持续发展目标 16 的背景下。我们还将更具体的建议与公共政策、事务和教育学院网络保持一致。行政部门的通用能力和公共管理地图集的核心内容领域。
更新日期:2019-01-28
down
wechat
bug