The purpose of this study is to analyse the contributions, major discussions and trends in the literature driving the research agenda in corporate social innovation (CSI). This is done through a systematic review on CSI publications in an open time span. Salient themes and emerging research topics in this literature, as well as research questions and limitations, are identified, culminating in a discussion of what is next for CSI research.,A systematic review was undertaken from academic and grey literature. Results were analysed following a bibliometric and interpretative content analysis.,The study provides novel insights on CSI research by drawing attention to discussions around the consensus on a definition of CSI, its disciplinary origins and the denominations referring to this field. Although CSI struggles to gain independence as a research field, the evidence shows that CSI is a cross-disciplinary concept nourished by multiple disciplines.,Analysis in this paper has implications for research by highlighting the state of scholarship on CSI. Given the use of multiple denominations of CSI, several studies using low diffused denominations could be discarded.,This research contributes to the body of knowledge in the field of CSI by bringing clarity to former discussions and by suggesting how the field can move forward to a more advanced and mature state in research.

中文翻译：

---

企业社会创新的见解：研究议程

本研究的目的是分析推动企业社会创新（CSI）研究议程的文献的贡献，主要讨论和趋势。这是通过在开放时间范围内对CSI出版物进行系统的审查来完成的。确定了这些文献中的突出主题和新兴研究主题，以及研究问题和局限性，最终对CSI研究的下一步进行了讨论。对学术和灰色文献进行了系统的综述。通过文献计量和解释性内容分析对结果进行了分析。该研究通过吸引人们对围绕CSI定义，其学科渊源和涉及该领域的名称达成共识的讨论，从而为CSI研究提供了新颖的见解。尽管CSI努力争取获得独立性作为研究领域，但有证据表明CSI是一个由多个学科培育的跨学科概念。本文的分析通过强调CSI的学术状况对研究具有启示意义。鉴于使用了CSI的多种面额，一些使用低扩散面额的研究可能会被放弃。这项研究通过使以前的讨论更加清晰，并提出了该领域如何发展到一个新的领域，为CSI领域的知识体系做出了贡献。在研究上处于更先进和成熟的状态。