Kim Pusik’s 金富軾 (1075–1151) Samguk sagi 三國史記 (History of the Three Kingdoms) is arguably the single most important document for understanding the history of the early Korean state of Silla 新羅 (traditional dates, 57 bce–935 ce). Despite the existence of other literary and archeological materials, as a royally sanctioned “standard history” the Samguk sagi continues to enjoy a position of power in determining the “history of Silla.” One of the most distinctive features of Silla society is its highly stratified social system as articulated through the establishment of its bureaucratic rank system (kyŏngwi 京位) and councils of nobles (hwabaek hoeŭi 和白會議). The Samguk sagi presents a narrative that functions as an “officially authorized” account of the institution of the seventeen-level system of capital ranks and other institutions of government administration in the first three centuries of the Common Era. To what extent can the historical narrative of the Samguk sagi be verified by epigraphy and other early literary materials? The uncomfortable truth is that inscriptions from the early Silla period provide no evidence that the capital rank system was established prior to the sixth century. More important, epigraphy shows that unlike the story found in the Samguk sagi, the formation of the capital rank system was probably more of a process that evolved vigorously during the crucial sixth century and probably achieved something close to its final form during the reign of King Chinhŭng 眞興 (540–576). Furthermore, despite the sequence of events reported in the Samguk sagi, administrative and managerial offices associated with the council of nobles in Silla—the Administration Chamber (chŏngsadang 政事堂) and Southern Chamber or South Hall (namdang 南堂)—probably did not take concrete form until at least the late seventh century. More than merely the ideological or rhetorical necessity of demonstrating that Silla and its institutions were “older” than those of Koguryŏ and Paekche, Kim Pusik and his associates—or perhaps even earlier historiographers—sought to create new historical memories of Silla, and by reshaping the past they strove to fashion the future.

中文翻译：

---

Samguk sagi是否可以通过金文来证实？：分析首都等级制度和贵族会议

Kim Pusik 的金富轼（1075-1151） Samguk sagi 三国史记（三国史）可以说是了解新罗新罗（传统日期，公元前 57 年-公元 935 年）早期朝鲜历史的最重要的文献。尽管存在其他文学和考古材料，但作为皇家认可的“标准历史”，三国先贤继续享有决定“新罗历史”的权力地位。新罗社会最显着的特征之一是其高度分层的社会制度，通过建立官僚等级制度 (kyŏngwi 京位) 和贵族委员会 (hwabaek hoeŭi 和白会议) 来表达。Samguk sagi 提供了一个叙述，作为对共同时代前三个世纪的十七级资本等级制度和其他政府管理机构的制度的“官方授权”描述。Samguk sagi的历史叙述可以在多大程度上被金石和其他早期文学材料验证？令人不安的事实是，新罗早期的铭文没有提供证据表明首都等级制度是在 6 世纪之前建立的。更重要的是，金石表明，与《三国传》中的故事不同，首都等级制度的形成可能更多是一个在关键的六世纪蓬勃发展的过程，并可能在国王统治时期达到接近其最终形式的程度。 Chinhŭng 眞兴 (540–576)。此外，尽管在 Samguk sagi 中报告了一系列事件，但与新罗贵族会议相关的行政和管理办公室 - 行政室（chŏngsadang 政事堂）和南厅或南厅（namdang 南堂） - 可能没有采取具体措施至少在七世纪后期形成。不仅仅是证明新罗及其制度比高句丽和百济“更古老”的意识形态或修辞必要性，Kim Pusik 和他的同事——或者甚至更早的历史学家——试图创造新罗的新历史记忆，并通过重塑过去，他们努力塑造未来。与新罗贵族会议相关的行政和管理办公室——行政厅 (chŏngsadang 政事堂) 和南厅或南厅 (namdang 南堂)——可能至少在 7 世纪后期才采用具体形式。不仅仅是证明新罗及其制度比高句丽和百济的制度“更古老”的意识形态或修辞必要性，Kim Pusik 和他的同事——或者甚至更早的历史学家——试图创造新罗的新历史记忆，并通过重塑过去，他们努力塑造未来。与新罗贵族会议相关的行政和管理办公室——行政厅 (chŏngsadang 政事堂) 和南厅或南厅 (namdang 南堂)——可能至少在 7 世纪后期才采用具体形式。不仅仅是证明新罗及其制度比高句丽和百济“更古老”的意识形态或修辞必要性，Kim Pusik 和他的同事——或者甚至更早的历史学家——试图创造新罗的新历史记忆，并通过重塑过去，他们努力塑造未来。