当前位置: X-MOL 学术Policy Futures in Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Is the Swedish transition regime still universalistic? A study on growing socio-geographical differences in youth establishment patterns
Policy Futures in Education ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-24 , DOI: 10.1177/1478210320949738
Jonas Olofsson 1 , Martin Kvist 1
Affiliation  

In welfare-policy studies, conditions are often depicted at a national level. This is the case not least in studies of young people’s paths and detours to working life. Studies at a high aggregation level have their advantages when it comes to distinguishing differences in living conditions between countries at similar economic development levels and examining the degree to which these differences can be related to institutional inequalities, differences in so-called welfare-policy regimes. But there is also a risk that studies of national regimes obscure the differences in socio-geographical conditions that exist in all countries. In this article we show how the socio-geographical conditions, to a great degree, affect young people’s ability to find work on the Swedish labor market with good development and support possibilities. A starting point is that the image of the Swedish transition regime as universalistic, as is often depicted in comparative research on young people’s transitions, obscures significant differences in young people’s transition and establishment patterns that are related to geographical residence. The Swedish universalistic regime encompasses a large and, over time, growing socio-geographically related spread of establishment opportunities for youths and young adults. We illustrate the circumstances by presenting comparable data in the form of an establishment index on the conditions for youths and young adults in Sweden’s 290 municipalities.

中文翻译:

瑞典的过渡制度是否仍然具有普遍性?青年人建立模式中不断增长的社会地理差异研究

在福利政策研究中,通常会在国家层面描述情况。在研究年轻人的工作道路和绕道而行时尤其如此。在区分具有相似经济发展水平的国家之间的生活条件差异,并研究这些差异与制度不平等(所谓的福利政策制度的差异)的相关程度时,高层次的研究具有其优势。但是,还有一种风险是,对国家政权的研究会掩盖所有国家存在的社会地理条件的差异。在本文中,我们展示了社会地理条件在很大程度上如何影响年轻人在瑞典劳动力市场上找到工作的能力,这些能力具有良好的发展和支持的可能性。出发点是,瑞典的过渡制度的普遍性形象,如对年轻人的转型的比较研究中经常描述的那样,掩盖了年轻人的过渡和与地理居住有关的建立模式的重大差异。瑞典的普遍主义政权涵盖了随着时间的推移,与社会和地理相关的,越来越大的年轻人和年轻人建立机会的传播。我们通过以瑞典290个直辖市的年轻人和年轻人的状况为基础的设施索引的形式提供可比数据来说明这种情况。掩盖了与地理居住有关的年轻人的过渡和建立模式的重大差异。瑞典的普遍主义政权涵盖了随着时间的推移,与社会和地理相关的,越来越大的年轻人和年轻人建立机会的传播。我们通过以瑞典290个直辖市的年轻人和年轻人的状况为基础的设施索引的形式提供可比数据来说明这种情况。掩盖了与地理居住相关的年轻人的过渡和建立模式的显着差异。瑞典的普遍主义政权涵盖了随着时间的推移,与社会和地理相关的,越来越大的年轻人和年轻人建立机会的传播。我们通过以瑞典290个直辖市的年轻人和年轻人的状况为基础的设施索引的形式提供可比数据来说明这种情况。
更新日期:2020-08-24
down
wechat
bug