Abstract Vision presents us with a richly detailed world. Yet, there is a range of limitations in the processing of visual information, such as poor peripheral resolution and failures to notice things we do not attend. This raises a natural question: How do we seem to see so much when there is considerable evidence indicating otherwise? In an elegant series of studies, Lau and colleagues have offered a novel answer to this long-standing question, proposing that our sense of visual richness is an artifact of decisional and metacognitive deficits. I critically evaluate this proposal and conclude that it rests on questionable presuppositions concerning the relationship between decisional and metacognitive processes, on one hand, and visual phenomenology, on the other.

中文翻译：

---

缩小通货膨胀：决策和元认知过程与视觉现象学之间的联系（或缺乏联系）

摘要视觉向我们展示了一个丰富而详尽的世界。但是，视觉信息的处理存在一系列局限性，例如较差的外围分辨率以及无法注意到我们不参加的事情。这就提出了一个自然的问题：当有大量证据表明相反时，我们怎么看得这么多？在一系列优雅的研究中，Lau及其同事为这个长期存在的问题提供了一个新颖的答案，提出我们的视觉丰富感是决定性和元认知缺陷的产物。我批判性地评估了该建议，并得出结论认为，该建议基于关于决策和元认知过程之间以及另一方面的视觉现象学之间的可疑前提。