Abstract More than 100 pieces of anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) legislation are active in 2018. In this current political climate of “conscience clause” legislation, counselor educators and supervisors are poised to adopt more holistic practices in assessing and evaluating student and supervisee readiness to work with LGBT queer (Q) clients. The purpose of this article is to present a dispositional framework for assessment and evaluation and introduce the flexibility, integrity, awareness, stability, compassion, and openness (FIASCO) rubric of professional counseling dispositions. Two court cases, Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley and Ward v. Wilbanks, are used as case examples for applying the FIASCO rubric to situations involving LGBTQ clients.

中文翻译：

---

制定监督学生咨询 LGBTQ 客户的评分标准

摘要 2018 年有超过 100 项反女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别 (LGBT) 立法生效。在当前“良心条款”立法的政治气候下，辅导员教育者和监督者准备在评估和评估方面采取更全面的做法。评估学生和受监管者是否准备好与 LGBT 酷儿 (Q) 客户合作。本文的目的是提出一个评估和评估的倾向框架，并介绍专业咨询倾向的灵活性、完整性、意识、稳定性、同情心和开放性 (FIASCO) 准则。两个法庭案件，Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley 和 Ward v. Wilbanks，被用作案例，将 FIASCO 准则应用于涉及 LGBTQ 客户的情况。