Livelihood interventions are recognized as instruments to deliver sustainable development by addressing multidimensional issues of poverty. Despite several interventions, success still remains trivial due to various interactive determinants. The purpose of this paper is to present the hierarchical model of determinants of rural livelihood interventions in India.,This study adopts interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach to explore the interactive relationships among determinants. Then, by using the Matrice d’ Impacts Croises - Multipication Applique a classement (MICMAC) approach, these determinants are classified into four groups on the basis of their driving power and dependence power.,The research findings include identification of nine critical determinants using hybrid research process. These nine determinants are classified into four distinct levels revealing different extents of influence on livelihood outcomes. The results show that strong emphasis should be given to local institutions and enclosing institutional environment in terms of good governance and better convergence.,The research findings offer insights for policy-makers on the hierarchical model among determinants. The study will help to close the existing dominant gap between theory and practice and imply corresponding methods and processes to deliver better livelihood outcomes.,This study contributes to policy literature by providing a structural model for interventions. This model identifies the dominant as well as mediating determinants and thereby guides policymakers to develop corresponding instruments and strategies. The study also contributes to rural development literature by identifying various interactive contextual relationships and thereby classifying the high priority determinants.

中文翻译：

---

农村民生干预的决定因素：ISM-MICMAC方法

生计干预被认为是通过解决贫困的多方面问题来实现可持续发展的手段。尽管采取了多种干预措施，但由于各种交互式决定因素，成功仍然微不足道。本文的目的是提出印度农村民生干预决定因素的层次模型。本研究采用解释结构模型（ISM）的方法来探讨决定因素之间的互动关系。然后，通过运用矩阵影响矩阵-乘积贴图分类法（MICMAC），将这些行列式根据其驱动力和依赖度分为四类。研究结果包括使用混合动力识别九个关键行列式研究过程。这九个决定因素分为四个不同的层次，揭示了对生计结果的不同程度的影响。结果表明，应从善治和更好的趋同角度高度重视地方机构和封闭的机构环境。研究结果为决策者在决定因素之间的分层模型提供了见识。该研究将有助于弥合理论与实践之间现有的主要差距，并暗示相应的方法和过程以提供更好的生计结果。该研究通过提供干预措施的结构模型，为政策文献做出了贡献。该模型确定了主导因素和中介因素，从而指导政策制定者制定相应的工具和策略。