This article intends to review the relationship between European organization and diversity. Europe lives in the legacy of division of nation and ethnicity as its main source dating from the nineteenth century. Although a hyper-real Europe has emerged overcoming its deeply divided meaning, the memory of the dividing past lives in other guises. I intend to look at current lines of division (east and west, north and south, new and old, rich and poor), considered as critical fault lines in European identity formation, turning to the notion of narrative identity, which builds upon philosophical accounts of identity in terms of continuity of self and collective consciousness, thus upon the story of space-time which makes sense for the individual and for the cultural group. The focus is intended to be on the potential for cross-fitting of particular narratives and their embedding in wider narratives (political and cultural, including values), on the potential of imagining of European unity, on uniting chronicle cultures and restructuring the interaction of multiple identities on political as well as on ethical grounds. The approach is linked to perspectives from Judt, Berlin, Delanty, Garcia, Gilbert, Nikolaidis, Trenz and also refers to the so-called ‘narrative turn’ in European studies.

中文翻译：

---

过去的现在：欧盟背景下的竞争性叙述的多元化

本文旨在回顾欧洲组织与多样性之间的关系。欧洲的历史可追溯到十九世纪，欧洲是国家和种族分裂的遗留。尽管一个超现实的欧洲已经克服了其深层分歧的含义，但在其他形式下，人们对前世分歧的记忆仍然记忆犹新。我打算看一下目前的分界线（东西方，北方和南方，新旧，富人和穷人），它们被认为是欧洲身份形成中的关键断层线，转向叙述性身份的概念，该概念基于哲学解释自我和集体意识的连续性来确定身份，因此，对于时空的故事，这对于个人和文化群体都是有意义的。重点是将特定叙事进行交叉拟合并将其嵌入更广泛的叙事（政治和文化，包括价值）中，设想欧洲统一的潜力，在统一编年文化和重组多元互动方面的潜力。政治和道德基础上的身份认同。该方法与来自Judt，柏林，德兰蒂，加西亚，吉尔伯特，尼古拉迪斯，特伦茨的观点相关联，并且也指欧洲研究中的所谓“叙事转向”。