Following the academic discourses that the International Business (IB) has not yet seen the levels of academic intrusions on decoupling a thorny ethical dilemma evident in other fields that explains why organizations when strive for conformity, they may attempt to preclude the necessity of their formal structure with an intention to show obedience towards institutional settings while at the same time actually practicing business in ways that they believe are more efficient. This study attempts to bridge this important gap and understanding of decoupling in the burgeoning stream of IB where export organizations decouple from the actual substantive conformity to the Intellectual Property Rights and the Protected Designation of Origin certification requirements. This policy to practice decoupling in the form of avoidance from institutional pressures and concealment manifest itself in the organizations zeal to placate the pressures of resource criticalities brought about by this unique isomorphic setting of the home and host country institutional landscape(s). Thus theoretically, tight coupling between institutional rules (and pressures) and export organizations does not necessarily translate from form to function but rather ceremonial conformity, which may further be heightened by onward problems of enforcement of these rules in the same institutional settings therein.

中文翻译：

---

国际商务中的脱钩

继学术讨论之后，国际商务 (IB) 尚未看到学术干预的程度，以解耦其他领域明显的棘手伦理困境，这解释了为什么组织在争取合规时，他们可能会试图排除其正式结构的必要性意图表现出对制度环境的服从，同时以他们认为更有效的方式实际开展业务。本研究试图弥合这一重要差距和对新兴 IB 流中脱钩的理解，其中出口组织与知识产权和受保护的原产地名称认证要求的实际实质性符合脱钩。这种以避免制度压力和隐瞒的形式实行脱钩的政策体现在组织热衷于安抚由母国和东道国制度景观的这种独特同构环境带来的资源临界压力。因此，从理论上讲，制度规则（和压力）与出口组织之间的紧密耦合并不一定会从形式转化为功能，而是仪式上的一致性，在相同的制度环境中执行这些规则的后续问题可能会进一步加剧这种情况。