We show how to solve common problems in identifying arguments from expert opinion, illustrated by five examples selected from The Economist. Our method started by intuitively identifying many appeals to alleged experts in The Economist and comparing them to the argumentation scheme for argument from expert opinion. This approach led us to (i) extending the existing list of possible faults committed when arguments from expert opinion are performed and (ii) proposing the extension of the list of linguistic cues that would allow analysts to identify arguments from expert opinion. Our ultimate aim is to help argument identification by argument mining connect better with techniques of argument analysis and evaluation.

我们展示了如何解决从专家意见中识别论点的常见问题，并从《经济学人》中选择了五个示例进行说明。我们的方法开始于直观地识别《经济学人》中对所谓的专家的许多诉求，并将其与论点方案进行比较，以征求专家意见。这种方法使我们（i）扩展了执行专家意见时所犯下的现有错误清单，以及（ii）提出了语言线索清单的扩展，这将使分析人员能够从专家意见中识别观点。我们的最终目标是通过论点挖掘来帮助论点识别与论点分析和评估技术更好地联系。