The aim of this paper is to provide new insights for the analysis of bias in polar questions by showing that the distinction proposed by Sudo (2013) between evidential and epistemic biases leads to an integrated picture of the Hungarian system of polar interrogatives. For the first time, a comprehensive analysis of this system is given here and it is shown how the contributions of certain formal features, such as the interrogative and the negative particles, can be captured independently. This perspective helps to explain restrictions on the occurrences of the different forms of polar interrogatives in Hungarian with respect to a large number of question uses. The paper derives the biases associated with the individual constituents from different sources and makes some proposals on how their impact could be incorporated into a formal model of dialogue.

本文的目的是通过证明Sudo（2013）提出的证据偏见和认知偏见之间的区别导致匈牙利极地疑问句系统的整体图景，从而为极地问题的偏见分析提供新的见解。首次在此给出了对该系统的全面分析，它显示了如何可以独立地捕获某些形式特征（例如疑问和否定粒子）的贡献。这种观点有助于解释在大量问题使用方面对匈牙利语中不同形式的极地疑问句的出现的限制。