To provide a global answer to a global problem, the climate change movement (CCM) has long organized itself around international organizations and summits. However, waning trust in a multilateral answer to climate change has motivated many in the CCM to abandon their traditional focus on UN climate summits (COPs) and to rely increasingly on decentralized actions and organizing. This fundamental transformation of the CCM has remained understudied. An important emerging question is what role global aspirations still play and how a ‘global’ CCM can be organized independent of the ‘globality’ provided by COPs. This article draws on interviews, observations and document analyses around and after the COP21 climate summit (Paris 2015) to offer an exploratory analysis of some of the main goals and efforts to construct alternative ‘globalities’. The findings depict both strengths and limitations of these strategies, which inform suggestions for future research.

为了提供全球性问题的全球答案，气候变化运动 (CCM) 长期以来一直围绕国际组织和峰会组织起来。然而，对气候变化多边解决方案的信任减弱已促使 CCM 中的许多人放弃他们对联合国气候峰会 (COP) 的传统关注，并越来越依赖于分散的行动和组织。CCM 的这种根本性转变仍未得到充分研究。一个新出现的重要问题是全球愿望仍然发挥什么作用，以及如何独立于 COP 提供的“全球性”来组织“全球”CCM。本文利用 COP21 气候峰会（巴黎，2015 年）前后的访谈、观察和文件分析，对构建替代“全球”的一些主要目标和努力进行了探索性分析。