productive and provocative concept. In the book, legal passing is rooted in Goffman’s research on the ‘presentation of self,’ but the concept might be much more fertile alongside a theoretically robust account of immigrant social and racial control, governmentality, and the navigation of “risk and surveillance” (167). Legal Passing implies these connections, but there is considerable opportunity to work them out in future publications. Although the book’s structure was challenging and key points fell short of more developed theoretical arguments, Legal Passing productively challenges and deepens our understanding of the effects of local immigration enforcement policy.

中文翻译：

---

书评：移民和美国黑人的重建

生产性和挑衅性的概念。在这本书中，法律通过植根于戈夫曼对研究“自我介绍”，但这个概念可能会更加肥沃旁边一个理论上强大的帐户移民社会和种族的控制，治理性，以及“风险和监视”导航（167）。法律传球意味着这些连接，但有工作出来在以后的出版物相当大的机会。虽然本书的结构很具挑战性的关键点不及较发达的理论论证，法律路过富有成效的挑战和加深了我们的地方移民执法政策的影响的认识。