This article examines jurisdictional disputes between the city of Salisbury and its bishops in the Elizabethan and early Stuart period, showing how debates over local control articulated broader ideas of order in the state. The civic leadership identified itself closely with the monarch in its bid for incorporation, arguing that prosperity and peace could only be achieved in this way. The bishops, in contrast, claimed that their own traditional authority over the city was the surest means of order, an argument that gained greater purchase under Charles I. Local actors could shape relations between themselves and the crown, but their success rested finally on the monarch's willingness to trust them to maintain the royal state.

中文翻译：

---

谁的城市？早期现代索尔兹伯里的公民政府和主教权力，约 .1590-1640

本文考察了伊丽莎白时代和斯图亚特早期的索尔兹伯里市与其主教之间的管辖权纠纷，展示了关于地方控制的辩论如何阐明了更广泛的国家秩序观念。公民领导层在争取合并的过程中与君主保持密切联系，认为只有通过这种方式才能实现繁荣与和平。相比之下，主教们声称他们自己对这座城市的传统权威是最可靠的秩序手段，这一论点在查理一世的统治下获得了更大的支持。当地演员可以塑造他们与王室之间的关系，但他们的成功最终取决于君主愿意信任他们来维护王室。