of the rest of the book. It does, however, provide an indication of van Es’ larger research programme (see, for example, her 2017 edited collection with Mirko Tobias Schäfer, The Datafied Society). The conclusion clearly rearticulates the book’s thesis – that liveness is a productive construction made possible by the interactions of institutions, platforms, users and social contexts. The cases largely contribute to supporting this claim and provide triangulation by highlighting distinct aspects of liveness. On the whole, the book deftly imposes a tentative order on a complex and wide-ranging set of issues without enforcing an arbitrary boundary or set of immutable rules. While the text falls somewhat short in answering the difficult question posed by its title (what is the future of live?), it is nonetheless effective in introducing advanced students and mass media researchers to the complexities of liveness, and itself makes a lively contribution to the field.

中文翻译：

---

书评：Geomedia：网络化城市和公共空间的未来 McQuireScott，Geomedia：网络化城市和公共空间的未来。新泽西州霍博肯：John Wiley & Sons，2016 年

本书的其余部分。然而，它确实表明了 van Es 更大的研究计划（例如，参见她 2017 年与 Mirko Tobias Schäfer 合编的合集，The Datafied Society）。结论清楚地重申了本书的论点——活力是一种通过机构、平台、用户和社会环境的相互作用而产生的生产性结构。这些案例在很大程度上有助于支持这一主张，并通过突出活力的不同方面来提供三角测量。总的来说，这本书巧妙地对一系列复杂而广泛的问题强加了一个试探性的命令，而没有强制执行任意的边界或一组不变的规则。虽然文本在回答其标题提出的难题（直播的未来是什么？）方面有些欠缺，