In the reporting period (February 2019-June 2019), the Court of Justice of the European Union did not deliver any ground breaking rulings that really altered existing coordination rules on social security. Nonetheless, the Court did rule in various interesting cases. These include the material scope of Regulation 883/2004 (Dreyer), the rules determining the applicable legislation (SF), invalidity benefits (Vester), and family benefits (Bogatu). In addition, the Court brought about clarification of the possibility of retaining worker status (and thus claiming social benefits as a worker) under Directive 2004/38 (Tarola) and the right of Turkish nationals to export benefits under Decision 3/80 when returning to Turkey (Coban).

中文翻译：

---

欧盟法院近期审理的案件概览（2019年2月-2019年6月）

在报告期内（2019 年 2 月至 2019 年 6 月），欧盟法院没有作出任何真正改变现有社会保障协调规则的突破性裁决。尽管如此，法院确实对各种有趣的案件进行了裁决。其中包括法规 883/2004 (Dreyer) 的实质范围、确定适用立法的规则 (SF)、伤残津贴 (Vester) 和家庭津贴 (Bogatu)。此外，法院还澄清了根据第 2004/38 号指令（塔罗拉）保留工人身份（并因此要求作为工人的社会福利）的可能性以及土耳其国民在返回土耳其时根据第 3/80 号决定出口福利的权利。土耳其（科班）。