situation, he seeks to recover the voice of participants. Respecting the need to understand the affair in its own terms, he considers Lip salient to the present as the most advanced expression of autogestionnaire experimentation, although paradoxically the watchmakers did not at least initially see it as such. Reid is surely correct that Lip posed big questions about radical political practice that remain pertinent today. The book closes with the aphorism: ‘Causes which were lost in Besançon may yet be won’. In this regard, Reid points to the Occupy movement, though that campaign did not focus upon workplaces, or self-managed production. Lip’s significance might be pushed further to the Gilets Jaunes – of whom the veteran of Lip and Agir Contre le Chômage Piaget has spoken in support – and on the need for labour and social movements to widen imaginary horizons to the fight for a post-fossil fuel economy.

中文翻译：

---

Ingrid Sharp 和 Matthew Stibbe，编辑，战争与和平之间的女性活动家：1918-1923 年的欧洲

在这种情况下，他试图恢复参与者的声音。考虑到需要用自己的术语来理解这件事，他认为 Lip 是当今最先进的 autogestionnaire 实验表达方式，尽管自相矛盾的是，制表师至少最初并没有这样认为。里德肯定是正确的，利普对激进的政治实践提出了重大问题，这些问题今天仍然相关。这本书以格言结尾：“在贝桑松丢失的原因可能还没有结束”。在这方面，里德指出了占领运动，尽管该运动并未关注工作场所或自我管理的生产。