In a 2019 article in this journal, which drew on previous work, we argued by examination of a number of extremely important cases that the senior judiciary is in the process of attempting to create judicial supremacy in the UK. It is doing so, not by democratic debate, but by legal procedural innovation incomprehensible to the electorate. Invited by the journal to reply to a criticism of our argument by Dr Stephanie Palmer and Dr Stevie Martin, we have sought to defend our account of the undemocratic procedural novelty of those cases.

中文翻译：

---

至上与霸权：对帕尔默和马丁的回应

在本期刊的2019年一篇文章中，该文章借鉴了先前的工作，我们通过审查一些非常重要的案例来辩称高级司法机关正在尝试在英国建立司法至上的过程。这样做不是通过民主辩论，而是通过选民难以理解的法律程序创新。受该期刊邀请，对斯蒂芬妮·帕尔默博士和史蒂夫·马丁博士对我们论点的批评提出答复，我们试图捍卫我们对这些案件不民主的程序新颖性的论述。