This paper explores the suppression of ideas within an academic scholarship by academics, either by self-suppression or because of the efforts of other academics. Legal, moral, and social issues distinguishing freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and academic freedom are reviewed. How these freedoms and protections can come into tension is then explored by an analysis of denunciation mobs that exercise their legal free speech rights to call for punishing scholars who express ideas they disapprove of and condemn. When successful, these efforts, which constitute legally protected speech, will suppress certain ideas. Real-world examples over the past five years of academics that have been sanctioned or terminated for scholarship targeted by a denunciation mob are then explored.

中文翻译：

---

奖学金抑制：理论观点和新兴趋势

本文探讨了学者在学术奖学金中对思想的压制，无论是由于自我压制还是由于其他学者的努力。审查了区分言论自由，探究自由和学术自由的法律，道德和社会问题。然后，通过对行使其合法的言论自由权的谴责暴民进行分析，探讨这些自由和保护如何变得紧张起来，这些暴民呼吁惩罚表达自己不同意和谴责思想的学者。成功完成后，这些受法律保护的言论便会压制某些想法。然后探究过去五年来学者因谴责暴民而被制裁或终止奖学金的现实例子。