This article is focused on gender mainstreaming at Swedish universities in the period from 2016–2019. Our research questions are: (a) In what form was gender mainstreaming introduced and did the form itself affect scholar’s academic rights? (b) Was the process in question compatible with international standards of institutional autonomy? (c) What effect did gender mainstreaming have on scholars’ ability to exercise their academic rights in accordance with international standards? Using the UNESCO Recommendations Concerning the Status of Higher-education Teaching Personnel (1997) as our international standard, we conclude that gender mainstreaming was introduced as a form of identity politics though government action and de facto supervision; that the latter was problematic from the perspective of institutional autonomy; that the choice of gender studies as a preferred scientific framework for university policy had a chilling effect on inquiry and free speech in other areas of research; and, finally, that gender mainstreaming led to violations of some scholars’ individual rights. The findings may be taken into account in evaluations of the outcome of gender mainstreaming at Swedish universities, all things considered.

中文翻译：

---

什么价格平等？政府监督瑞典大学中性别主流化的学术成本

本文重点介绍了2016-2019年期间瑞典大学中的性别主流化。我们的研究问题是：（a）以何种形式将性别观点纳入主流，这种形式本身是否影响学者的学术权利？（b）有关程序是否符合机构自治的国际标准？（c）将性别观点纳入主流对学者按照国际标准行使其学术权利的能力产生了什么影响？我们采用联合国教科文组织《关于高等教育教学人员地位的建议》（1997年）作为国际标准，得出的结论是，尽管政府采取了行动，事实上也将性别主流化作为一种​​身份政治的形式被引入。监督 从制度自治的角度来看，后者是有问题的；将性别研究作为大学政策的首选科学框架的选择对其他研究领域的探究和言论自由产生了冷淡的影响；最后，性别主流化导致某些学者的个人权利受到侵犯。考虑到所有因素，在评估瑞典大学将性别观点纳入主流的结果时，可以考虑该发现。