当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Who is deterministic? On the nature of interdisciplinary research in archaeology
Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2019-06-07 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203819000060
Kristian Kristiansen

Arponen et al.’s paper is a timely discussion paper which raises basic issues about the relationship between environmental science and archaeology, and thus about the relationship between science and archaeology more broadly. My comments will therefore begin with a discussion of the nature of interdisciplinary research, as a background for re-evaluating the question of determinism in environmental research. Thus more recently we have seen a critical concern or even anxiety emerge over how to reconcile science-based and humanistic traditions of interpretation in a period of expanding importance of science-based knowledge in aDNA studies (Callaway 2018; Sørensen 2017; Kristiansen 2017). It raises the question of their relationship and of what provides good practice.

中文翻译:

谁是确定性的?论考古学跨学科研究的本质

阿波宁等。的论文是一篇及时的讨论论文,它提出了关于环境科学与考古学之间关系的基本问题,从而更广泛地讨论了科学与考古学之间的关系。因此,我的评论将首先讨论跨学科研究的性质,作为重新评估环境研究中的决定论问题的背景。因此,最近我们看到,在基于科学的知识在 aDNA 研究中的重要性不断扩大的时期,如何调和基于科学的解释传统和人文主义的解释传统出现了严重的担忧甚至焦虑(Callaway 2018;Sørensen 2017;Kristiansen 2017)。它提出了他们的关系以及什么提供了良好做法的问题。
更新日期:2019-06-07
down
wechat
bug