当前位置: X-MOL 学术Archaeological Dialogues › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Against object agency 2. Continuing the discussion with Sørensen
Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2019-06-07 , DOI: 10.1017/s1380203819000011
Artur Ribeiro

This paper expands upon some of the arguments and issues surrounding object agency that have been discussed in this journal (Lindstrøm 2015; 2017; Ribeiro 2016a; 2016b; Sørensen 2016; 2018). More specifically, it challenges Sørensen’s support of object agency in his latest discussion on the topic (2018). The paper is divided into three parts: first, it questions the relevance of replacing the conventional usage of ‘agency’, generally attached to sociological studies and reserved to describe human action, with one supported by the New Materialists; second, it identifies a series of contradictions in how agency is defined according to the New Materialisms, namely how it can be very labile and scalable yet simultaneously universal and applicable across all cultures and time periods; and lastly, it questions the quality of the philosophical ideas supporting the New Materialist conception of agency, and its disadvantages in light of the current re-emergence and repopularization of processual archaeology.

中文翻译:

反对对象代理 2. 继续与 Sørensen 讨论

本文扩展了本期刊中讨论的围绕对象代理的一些论点和问题(Lindstrøm 2015;2017;Ribeiro 2016a;2016b;Sørensen 2016;2018)。更具体地说,它挑战了 Sørensen 在他关于该主题的最新讨论(2018 年)中对对象代理的支持。这篇论文分为三个部分:首先,它质疑用新唯物主义者支持的“能动性”的传统用法取代传统用法的相关性,后者通常附在社会学研究中,保留用于描述人类行为。其次,它确定了根据新唯物主义如何定义代理的一系列矛盾,即它如何非常不稳定和可扩展,但同时又普遍适用于所有文化和时间段;最后,
更新日期:2019-06-07
down
wechat
bug