当前位置: X-MOL 学术Beyond Behavior › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An Evidence-Based Logic for the Use of Positive Reinforcement: Responses to Typical Criticisms
Beyond Behavior ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-05-17 , DOI: 10.1177/1074295620917153
Terrance M. Scott 1 , Timothy J. Landrum 1
Affiliation  

In this article, we provide both a critical analysis of and logical response to a set of the most typical school-based objections to the effective use of positive reinforcement. For example, one objection is that positive reinforcement amounts to bribery. Practitioners are provided with clear and concise arguments refuting each objection and data-informed rationales supporting the school-based use of positive reinforcement.



中文翻译:

使用积极强化的循证逻辑:对典型批评的回应

在本文中,我们提供了对一系列最典型的校本反对有效使用积极强化的反对意见的批判性分析和逻辑回应。例如,一个反对意见是积极的强化等于贿赂。为从业人员提供了简洁明了的论据,驳斥了每个反对意见,并提供了基于数据的理论依据,以支持学校在学校使用积极强化。

更新日期:2020-05-17
down
wechat
bug