Different and evolving conceptualisations of perfectionism have led to the development of numerous perfectionism measures in an attempt to capture the true representations of the construct. It is, therefore, important to ensure that these instruments are valid and reliable. The present systematic review examined the literature for the psychometric properties of the most commonly used general multidimensional trait perfectionism self-report measures. Relevant studies were identified by a systematic electronic search of academic databases. A total of 349 studies were identified, with 38 of these meeting inclusion criteria. The psychometric properties presented in each of these studies were subjected to assessment using a standardised protocol. All studies were evaluated by two reviewers independently. Results indicated that while none of the included measures demonstrated adequacy across all of the nine psychometric properties assessed, most were found to possess adequate internal consistency and construct validity. The absence of evidence to support adequate measurement properties over a number of domains for the measures included in this review may be attributed to the criteria of adequacy used, with some appearing overly strict and less relevant to perfectionism measures. Clinical and research relevance of the present findings and directions for future research are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

多维特质完美主义自我报告测量的心理测量学特性的系统评价

完美主义的不同和不断发展的概念化导致了许多完美主义措施的发展，以试图捕捉结构的真实表现。因此，重要的是要确保这些文书是有效和可靠的。本系统评价检查了文献中最常用的一般多维特质完美主义自我报告测量的心理测量特性。通过对学术数据库的系统电子搜索确定了相关研究。共确定了 349 项研究，其中 38 项符合纳入标准。这些研究中的每一项中呈现的心理测量特性都使用标准化协议进行了评估。所有研究均由两名评审员独立评估。结果表明，虽然所包含的测量指标均未显示出所有评估的九个心理测量特性的充分性，但发现大多数测量具有足够的内部一致性和结构效度。缺乏证据支持本次审查中包含的测量在多个领域的足够测量属性可能归因于所使用的充分性标准，其中一些似乎过于严格并且与完美主义测量的相关性较低。讨论了当前发现的临床和研究相关性以及未来研究的方向。缺乏证据支持本次审查中包含的测量在多个领域的足够测量属性可能归因于所使用的充分性标准，其中一些似乎过于严格并且与完美主义测量的相关性较低。讨论了当前发现的临床和研究相关性以及未来研究的方向。缺乏证据支持本次审查中包含的测量在多个领域的足够测量属性可能归因于所使用的充分性标准，其中一些似乎过于严格并且与完美主义测量的相关性较低。讨论了当前发现的临床和研究相关性以及未来研究的方向。