当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asian Review of World Histories › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A Reconsideration of the Leilou – Longbian Debate: A Continuation of Research by Nishimura Masanari
Asian Review of World Histories ( IF 0.1 ) Pub Date : 2017-10-04 , DOI: 10.1163/22879811-12340004
Lê Huy Phạm 1
Affiliation  

In 111 BCE , the Han Dynasty destroyed the Nanyue Kingdom and put the region under the Jiaozhi Commandery. The headquarters of the Jiaozhi Commandery was originally Miling, but was later moved to Leilou and then to Longbian. There have been many hypotheses regarding the location of Leilou and Longbian. In particular, many scholars have identified the remains of the old citadel (Lũng Khe Citadel) located in Thuận Thanh District (Bắc Ninh, Vietnam) with the Leilou Citadel. Based on archaeological evidence, the late Dr. Nishimura Masanari advanced a new hypothesis that these remains were not the citadel of Leilou, but that of Longbian. This article will review historical documents about Leilou and Longbian and introduce two inscriptions recently discovered in Bắc Ninh Province to provide further support for Nishimura’s hypothesis.

中文翻译:

对“雷楼-龙边辩论”的重新思考:西村正成的研究继续

公元前111年,汉朝摧毁了南岳王国,并将该地区置于礁直统辖下。交趾指挥官的总部原为米林,但后来移至雷楼,然后移至龙边。关于雷楼和龙边的位置有许多假设。尤其是,许多学者已经将位于雷恩城堡的ThuậnThanh区(越南BắcNinh)的旧城堡(LũngKhe城堡)的遗迹识别出来。根据考古证据,已故的Nishimura Masanari博士提出了一个新的假设,即这些遗骸不是雷娄的城堡,而是龙边的城堡。本文将回顾有关雷娄和龙边的历史文献,并介绍最近在北宁省发现的两个铭文,为西村的假设提供进一步的支持。
更新日期:2017-10-04
down
wechat
bug