initiatives like the Florida Academic Repository (FLARE) and Journal Retention and Needs Listing (JRNL). Mr. Walker outlined some of the desired outcomes for participation in shared print initiatives. Those involve compatible data requirements, efficiencies in workflows, and benefits to stakeholders, all of which point to the promise of shared print programs and their contribution to the greater good. Equally important, they signal long-term implications for the future of libraries. At the same time, he noted that there are a number of challenges standing in the way of this vision. Among them are the difficulty of getting data out of a variety of systems, bad or incomplete legacy data, automated processes that can introduce problems, and limited resources. Communication among stakeholders is another issue. For instance, the Smathers Libraries has hundreds of employees and multiple branches. Like its shared print partners, its organizational structure spreads responsibilities for these kinds of programs across multiple departments and units. There can be a lot of crossover in duties, as well. Because of this, internal and external communication can be problematic at times. He ended with some thoughts for the audience. These included recognizing that shared collections are important; acknowledging that we need to identify our core mission so that competing initiatives can be prioritized; understanding that we need to create mechanisms to support complex workflows and processes; and realizing that we have to make choices in the face of limited resources. With just under 100 attendees, the audience was treated to a synchronous lineup of presentations from some of the leading members of the profession. Ms. Robare and Mr. Long recounted noteworthy projects aimed at increasing the cataloging community’s practical knowledge of identity management best practices, while Mr. Walker outlined the value of participation in shared print programs and offered several important considerations for participation. Yet in a serendipitous turn, the program ended up as an examination, from several angles, of a larger issue facing many department heads; how to best allocate limited staff time and other resources to projects like these in the face of competing priorities. Of course, this issue is somewhat of a Gordian knot, but it was encouraging to see the resolve of each speaker to engage in creatively addressing it in their respective circumstances.

中文翻译：

---

ALCTS 书目概念模型兴趣小组 (IG) 论坛会议报告，美国图书馆协会冬季会议，费城，2020 年 1 月

佛罗里达学术知识库 (FLARE) 和期刊保留和需求列表 (JRNL) 等举措。Walker 先生概述了参与共享印刷计划的一些预期成果。这些涉及兼容的数据要求、工作流程的效率以及利益相关者的利益，所有这些都表明共享打印程序的承诺及其对更大利益的贡献。同样重要的是，它们标志着对图书馆未来的长期影响。同时，他指出，实现这一愿景还面临许多挑战。其中包括从各种系统中获取数据的困难、不良或不完整的遗留数据、可能引入问题的自动化流程以及有限的资源。利益相关者之间的沟通是另一个问题。例如，Smathers 图书馆拥有数百名员工和多个分支机构。与其共享的印刷合作伙伴一样，其组织结构将此类计划的责任分散到多个部门和单位。职责也可能有很多交叉。因此，内部和外部沟通有时会出现问题。他以对观众的一些想法结束。其中包括认识到共享馆藏很重要；承认我们需要确定我们的核心使命，以便优先考虑相互竞争的举措；了解我们需要创建机制来支持复杂的工作流程和流程；并意识到我们必须在资源有限的情况下做出选择。参加人数不到100人，观众们观看了来自该行业的一些主要成员的同步演讲阵容。Robare 女士和 Long 先生讲述了旨在提高编目界对身份管理最佳实践的实践知识的值得注意的项目，而 Walker 先生概述了参与共享印刷计划的价值，并提供了参与的几个重要考虑因素。然而，在一个意外的转折中，该计划最终从多个角度审视了许多部门负责人面临的一个更大的问题。面对相互竞争的优先事项，如何最好地将有限的员工时间和其他资源分配给此类项目。当然，这个问题有点棘手，