ABSTRACT Bruno Latour advocates for portrayals of science in the making but does not explain how the public can access these portrayals. This article addresses that gap by analyzing how 199 press releases from NASA’s Curiosity mission depict science. Results indicate that the releases often cover Curiosity’s tools and activities, occasionally feature scientists at work, and rarely mention controversies. Ultimately, these press releases provide the public an engaging but partial perspective on science in the making.

中文翻译：

---

来自火星的消息

摘要 布鲁诺·拉图尔 (Bruno Latour) 提倡对正在形成的科学进行描绘，但没有解释公众如何获得这些描绘。本文通过分析来自 NASA 好奇号任务的 199 份新闻稿如何描述科学来解决这一差距。结果表明，这些版本通常涵盖好奇号的工具和活动，偶尔会以科学家的工作为特色，很少提及争议。最终，这些新闻稿为公众提供了一个引人入胜但片面的科学视角。