ABSTRACT

Limiting dangerous climate change is now widely believed to require negative emissions (NETs), a prospect some believe to be unjust and unacceptably risky. While NETs are not risk-free, I argue that they could be part of minimally just responses to climate change. In doing so, I identify a dilemma between limiting warming to 1.5 ° C, which promises lower climate impacts but implies greater NETs risks, and 2°C, which requires less NETs but promises greater climate impacts. Finally, I consider what the case of NETs reveals about permissibility in the face of non-compliance with principles of climate justice.

中文翻译：

---

关于负排放的许可（或其他）

摘要

现在人们普遍认为，限制危险的气候变化需要负排放 (NET)，一些人认为这种前景是不公正的，而且风险高得令人无法接受。虽然 NET 并非没有风险，但我认为它们可以成为应对气候变化的最低限度的一部分。这样做时，我发现了将升温限制在 1.5 °C（这会降低气候影响但意味着 NET 风险更大）和 2°C（需要较少的 NET 但会带来更大的气候影响）之间的两难选择。最后，我考虑了 NET 案例揭示了在不遵守气候正义原则的情况下的可允许性。