ABSTRACT This paper discusses Aldred’s glosses to the expanded forms of a series of abbreviations (or notae) of (Roman) legal terms included on fols 85r–86r of Durham, Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19. By taking a novel approach to Aldred’s work and focusing on what his glossing practices can tell us about his scholarly interests rather than his taste for morphological and semantic structures, this paper shows that, unlike other glossators working south of the Humber, Aldred did not have an interest in the study of (Roman) legal matters and therefore his work should not be aligned with that of Southumbrian scholars, as has been the case in the past. Nonetheless, his work is still very important for our understanding of legal studies in pre-Conquest England: while the Southumbrian materials are dominated by Isidore’s Etymologies, Aldred’s list provides an insight into other sources available to pursue this field of study in early medieval England.

中文翻译：

---

奥尔德雷德在达勒姆 A.iv.19 中的注解：个人、文本和文化背景

摘要 本文讨论了奥尔德雷德对一系列（罗马）法律术语缩写（或注释）的扩展形式的注解，这些缩写形式包括在 Durham，Cathedral Library，MS A.iv.19 的 fols 85r–86r 中。通过对奥尔德雷德的工作采取一种新颖的方法，并关注他的注解实践可以告诉我们关于他的学术兴趣而不是他对形态和语义结构的品味，这篇论文表明，与在亨伯河以南工作的其他注解者不同，奥尔德雷德没有对（罗马）法律问题的研究感兴趣，因此他的工作不应该像过去那样与 Southumbrian 学者的研究保持一致。尽管如此，他的工作对于我们理解征服前英格兰的法律研究仍然非常重要：虽然南森伯利亚的材料以伊西多尔的词源学为主，