ABSTRACT There have been numerous calls by coaching researchers for Foucauldian-informed coach developers to help coaches change their practices to be less reliant on discipline’s techniques and instruments. In this paper, we explored what it might mean for a Foucauldian-informed coach developer to work collaboratively with a male university endurance running coach as he learned how to problematize the use of discipline. More specifically, we examined some of the barriers, challenges, and opportunities that the coach experienced as he attempted to learn, in collaboration with the first author, how to question the unintended consequences of discipline’s techniques and instruments and rethink the “total effects” of his coaching practices. The results revealed that the coach was able to show a degree of problematization, however, in the field the deep-rooted connection between endurance running, physiology, and discipline made coaching for him in a less disciplinary way a challenge. To conclude, Foucauldian-informed coach developers working in sports where physiology is the predominant sport science could use specific pedagogical strategies that work with and explicitly complicate the strong cyclical relationship between discipline and physiology to help coaches implement practices that are less dominated by, not absent of, physiology.

中文翻译：

---

生理学与学科之间的周期性关系：一位耐力奔跑的教练的经历使纪律练习成问题

摘要教练研究人员曾多次呼吁富国银行通知教练开发人员，以帮助教练改变其做法，以减少对学科技术和手段的依赖。在本文中，我们探讨了一位富国知识的教练开发者与一名男性大学耐力跑教练合作的意义，因为他学会了如何使纪律使用成问题。更具体地说，我们与第一作者合作，研究了教练在尝试学习时遇到的一些障碍，挑战和机会，如何质疑学科技术和手段的意外后果，以及如何重新思考学科的“总体影响”他的教练实践。结果表明，教练能够显示出一定程度的问题，但是，在该领域，耐力跑，生理学和纪律之间的根深蒂固的联系使得以较少纪律的方式为他提供教练成为一项挑战。总而言之，在体育是生理学占主导地位的体育运动中，受过福冈教育训练的教练开发人员可以使用特定的教学策略，与学科和生理学之间的强循环关系配合使用，并明确使其复杂化，以帮助教练实施较少被主导而不是不被主导的实践生理学。