当前位置: X-MOL 学术South African Journal of Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The ethics of prioritisation and advocacy dilemmas: Bullfighting or veganism?
South African Journal of Philosophy ( IF 0.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/02580136.2019.1706385
Luis Cordeiro-Rodrigues 1
Affiliation  

Animal, Basta and PAN are the main advocates of animal rights in Portugal. These groups have prioritised abolishing bullfighting over other causes. It is the purpose of this article to challenge the reasons why this prioritisation was made and argue that pro-vegan campaigns should be prioritised. I argue that this prioritisation ought not to be made for a variety of reasons. Namely animal farming is the main cause of suffering; the educational argument provided is disproved by theory and empirical evidence; and it does not follow from the fact that anti-bullfighting campaigns are more likely to succeed and that pro-vegan and anti-animal farming campaigns are utopian, that the latter form of campaigning should be allocated a secondary role. My argument, therefore, is that pro-vegan campaigns are to be prioritised not only because the arguments to prioritise the abolition of bullfighting fail, but also due to the fact that there are positive reasons to support pro-vegan campaigning.

中文翻译:

优先排序和倡导困境的伦理:斗牛还是素食主义者?

Animal,Basta和PAN是葡萄牙动物权利的主要倡导者。这些团体将废除斗牛列为优先事项。本文的目的是挑战进行此优先级排序的原因,并主张应对素食主义者的竞选活动进行优先级排序。我认为,不应出于各种原因而进行这种优先排序。也就是说,畜牧业是造成苦难的主要原因;提供的教育论据被理论和经验证据所证明;而且,并非因为反斗牛运动更有可能取得成功,而素食主义者和反动物养殖运动是乌托邦式的,所以后者的运动形式应该被分配为次要角色。因此,我的论点是
更新日期:2020-01-02
down
wechat
bug