ABSTRACT This paper interrogates the reparative possibilities of representing subjugated voices in historical narratives. It examines, first, the onto-epistemic conditions under which this representation becomes possible. Further, it demonstrates that the possibility of representation is contingent upon the reproduction of the subjugated subject as a signifier of onto-epistemic difference. This form of representation fails to repair the harm underlying subjugation. The paper concludes by demonstrating the need for telling more ‘surprising’ stories that unravel material and symbolic attachments to the given onto-epistemic order. The argument proceeds through an engagement with the figure of the woman as she circulates in the histories of the 1947 Partition of India and Pakistan. In particular, it engages the figure of the martyred woman and the abducted woman as they emerge in testimony and film, respectively.

中文翻译：

---

代表征服：或者，分区历史中的女性形象

摘要本文探讨了在历史叙事中表达被征服的声音的修复可能性。首先，它考察了在流行病学条件下这种表达成为可能的情况。此外，它证明了表示的可能性取决于被征服的对象作为本体上差异的指示符的再现。这种表述形式无法弥补潜在的损害。本文最后通过说明有必要讲更多“令人惊讶”的故事来揭示给定的流行病学顺序的实质性和象征性附件。该论点是通过与1947年印度和巴基斯坦分区历史上流传的女性形象的互动来进行的。特别是，