ABSTRACT Evidence based practice [EBP] has had a strong influence on social work practice, research, and education. EBP is a multi-step process for health care decision making which includes relevant research findings in treatment planning together with the client’s preferences and clinical expertise. An empirically supported treatments [EST] is a designation for treatments for a given disorder that have met specific standards for research quality. ESTs are often part of the EBP process but are not identical to it. This article reports results from a review of relevant 200 articles from the Social Work Abstracts database, showing social workers fail to distinguish the two concepts, and often fail to define them fully and clearly. More published reports conflate ESTs with EBP than correctly distinguish the two concepts. Recommendation to strengthen future social work publications, practice and education are offered.

中文翻译：

---

让我们清楚地区分循证实践和经验支持的治疗

摘要 循证实践 [EBP] 对社会工作实践、研究和教育产生了强大的影响。EBP 是一个多步骤的医疗决策过程，其中包括治疗计划中的相关研究结果以及客户的偏好和临床专业知识。经验支持的治疗 [EST] 是对特定疾病的治疗指定，这些治疗已达到研究质量的特定标准。EST 通常是 EBP 流程的一部分，但并不完全相同。本文报告了对 Social Work Abstracts 数据库中的 200 篇相关文章的审查结果，表明社会工作者无法区分这两个概念，并且经常无法完全清楚地定义它们。更多已发表的报告将 EST 与 EBP 混为一谈，而不是正确区分这两个概念。