当前位置: X-MOL 学术Current Opinion in Psychology › 论文详情
Sexual Prejudice, Sexism, and Religion
Current Opinion in Psychology ( IF 4.162 ) Pub Date : 2021-08-01 , DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.024
Chana Etengoff, Tyler G Lefevor

Multi-national and meta-analytic studies suggest that the pathways between religiousness and sexism/sexual prejudice are partially mediated by sociopersonality factors such as conservatism. In this article, we describe the contributing factors to this relationship, such as authoritarianism and fundamentalism. These factors interact at the dynamic nexus of individual and social development. As such, religiously situated sexism and sexual prejudice are not viewed as inevitable outcomes to religious practice and faith. Individual differences (e.g. conservatism), congregational (e.g. doctrine/policies, limited contact), and cultural factors (e.g. power hierarchies) mutually contribute to this landscape, and individuals ultimately make choices regarding their behavior and views. Further research exploring the mechanisms of religiously situated gender inequality and sexual prejudice is essential given the associated negative outcomes for individuals, relationships, and communities. Our growing grasp of the agentive pathways leading to religiously situated prejudice and discrimination is enriching our understanding of how individual differences and social contexts contribute to sexism and sexual prejudice.

中文翻译:

性偏见,性别歧视和宗教

跨国和荟萃分析研究表明,宗教信仰与性别歧视/性偏见之间的关系部分由诸如保守主义之类的社会人格因素介导。在本文中,我们描述了促成这种关系的因素,例如威权主义和原教旨主义。这些因素在个人和社会发展的动态联系中相互作用。因此,宗教上的性别歧视和性偏见并非被视为宗教实践和信仰的必然结果。个体差异(例如,保守主义),群体(例如,学说/政策,有限的接触)和文化因素(例如,权力等级制)共同构成了这种局面,个人最终会根据自己的行为和观点做出选择。考虑到与个人,人际关系和社区相关的负面结果,进一步研究探索宗教上存在的性别不平等和性偏见的机制至关重要。我们对导致宗教上偏见和歧视的代理途径的日益了解,正在丰富我们对个体差异和社会背景如何导致性别歧视和性偏见的理解。
更新日期:2021-08-01
全部期刊列表>>
2021中国学者有奖调研
JACS
材料科学跨学科高质量前沿研究
中国作者高影响力研究精选
虚拟特刊
屿渡论文,编辑服务
何川
清华大学
郭维
上海中医药大学
华东师范大学
北京大学许言
楚甲祥
西湖石航
上海交大
北理工
隐藏1h前已浏览文章
课题组网站
新版X-MOL期刊搜索和高级搜索功能介绍
ACS材料视界
南开大学
张韶光
华辉
天合科研
x-mol收录
试剂库存
down
wechat
bug