ABSTRACT This essay tracks Heidegger’s thought from 1919 forwards to the decisive years of his political engagement, on behalf of the Nazi movement. Part 1 tracks how the question concerning Being devolves into the implicitly identitarian question of who “we” are. Part 2 addresses the “existential” of Befindlichkeit which Heidegger in Sein und Zeit positions as prior to understanding, and examines his esoteric mode of writing as the means to cultivate a prerational Stimmung. Part 3 examines Heidegger’s response to his 1929–1930 questions of “What mood must we awaken? ... Who are we, then?” in the decisive years of the Gleichchaltung, showing how Heidegger’s thinking elevates to ontological primacy a discriminatory and identitarian decision concerning who “we” are as the German volk. Part 4 examines in this light the Heideggerian “end of philosophy” in what the Black Notebooks talks of in terms of a “metapolitics ‘of’ the historical people”.

中文翻译：

---

从范畴到存在主义：哲学的程序性破坏

摘要本文是代表纳粹运动追踪海德格尔从1919年到他政治接触的决定性年代的思想。第1部分跟踪关于“存在”的问题如何演变为“我们”是谁的隐含同一性问题。第2部分论述了海德格尔在理解和发现之前在海德格尔之前所存在的Befindlichkeit的“存在性”，并考察了他深奥的写作模式作为培养理性的Stimmung的手段。第3部分探讨了海德格尔对1929-1930年“我们必须唤醒什么心情？...那我们是谁？” 在Gleichchaltung的决定性年代中，表明海德格尔的思想如何提升为本体论的首要地位，这是关于谁是德国人的歧视性和认同性决定。