ABSTRACT I argue that Iris Marion Young’s concept of political responsibility is well suited for transnational feminism analyses. Young’s work reveals the intersections of ethical, social, and political theory; her model of political responsibility articulates a view of shared social and political responsibility for the structural conditions of exploitation and domination. Young’s theory of political responsibility provides an account that views responsibility for social injustice as both deeply personal, and shared. She argues that we can only discharge our political responsibility by engaging with others in collective actions that seek to change unjust situation and institutions. I argue that Young’s model of political responsibility, because of its focus on structural injustice, provides a more nuanced account of global justice than either a human rights framework, or a cosmopolitan framework. Because Young’s theory of political responsibility focuses on structural injustice we can use it to analyze inequalities and asymmetries of power with respect to gender and in terms of structural injustice.

中文翻译：

---

全球性别正义：人权与政治责任

摘要我认为，艾里斯·马里昂·杨（Iris Marion Young）的政治责任概念非常适合跨国女性主义分析。扬的作品揭示了伦理，社会和政治理论的交集；她的政治责任模型阐明了对剥削和统治的结构性条件承担共同的社会和政治责任的观点。扬的政治责任理论提供了一个将社会不公正责任视为深切的个人责任和共同责任的论述。她认为，我们只能通过与他人一起参与旨在改变不公正局势和体制的集体行动来履行我们的政治责任。我认为，扬的政治责任模型由于着重于结构性不公，与人权框架或国际框架相比，它对全球正义的描述更为细微。由于杨的政治责任理论侧重于结构性不公，我们可以用它来分析权力在性别和结构性不公方面的不平等和不对称。