ABSTRACT The concept of archaeological heritage management (AHM) has been key to wider archaeological research and preservation agendas for some decades. Many universities and other education providers now offer what is best termed heritage management education (HME) in various forms. The emphasis is commonly on archaeological aspects of heritage in a broad sense and different terms are often interchangeable in practice. In an innovative working-conference held in Tampere, Finland, we initiated a debate on what the components of AHM as a course or curriculum should include. We brought together international specialists and discussed connected questions around policy, practice, research and teaching/training, at local, national, transnational and World Heritage levels. In this article we take the Tampere discussions further, focusing especially on the meaning, necessity, implications and prerequisites of interdisciplinary HME. We offer our thoughts on developing HME that reflects the contemporary aspects and needs of heritage and its management.

中文翻译：

---

教学考古遗产管理。朝着范式的转变

摘要几十年来，考古遗产管理（AHM）的概念一直是更广泛的考古研究和保护议程的关键。现在，许多大学和其他教育提供者都以各种形式提供所谓的遗产管理教育（HME）。通常在广义上着重于遗产的考古方面，并且在实践中通常可以互换使用不同的术语。在芬兰坦佩雷举行的一次创新工作会议上，我们就AHM作为课程或课程的组成部分应包括哪些内容展开了辩论。我们召集了国际专家，并在地方，国家，跨国和世界遗产级别讨论了有关政策，实践，研究和教学/培训的相关问题。在本文中，我们将进一步讨论Tampere，重点关注跨学科HME的含义，必要性，含义和前提条件。我们提供有关开发HME的想法，以反映遗产及其管理的当代方面和需求。