ABSTRACT This contribution makes the point that we have entered an era of post-legitimisation whereby intervening states invest little energy into justifying their international interventions. Non-Western intervening states are often accused of offering very minimal justifications for their presence and actions overseas. Where justificatory statements are made, they are often short and bland. In an interesting convergence, leading proponent states of the liberal peace have followed suit and no longer offer lengthy justifications of their actions. At the high-point of liberal internationalism in the 1990s and the early 2000s, immense diplomatic capital was expended on justifying intervention. Now that is not the case. Where justification is made, it deploys the language of security and stabilisation.

中文翻译：

---

后合法性和后合法性：西方和非西方干预的融合

摘要这项贡献表明，我们已经进入了后合法化时代，在此期间，干预国几乎没有花力气来证明其国际干预的合理性。非西方干预国家经常被指责为其在海外的存在和行动提供极少的理由。在作出正当理由陈述的地方，通常简短而乏味。在一个有趣的融合中，自由和平的主要支持国也纷纷效仿，不再为他们的行动提供冗长的理由。在1990年代和2000年代初期的自由国际主义高峰时期，巨大的外交资本被用于证明干预的正当性。现在情况并非如此。在提出正当理由的地方，它会部署安全和稳定的语言。