ABSTRACT Why did the 2005 Helsinki Agreement lead to peace in Aceh while the 2000 Humanitarian Pause and the 2002 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement floundered? This paper argues that a decidedly illiberal peace-building approach led to the cessation of hostilities and subsequent peace in the Indonesian province. Conflict termination in Aceh was premised on the transition from a wartime political order to a peacetime order. The shift from a wartime to peacetime political order entailed the assuaging and renegotiating of patronage, rent-seeking privileges and social hierarchies that existed during the conflict. The end of the Aceh conflict led to the perpetuation of the wartime elite’s stranglehold over the province’s political economy.

中文翻译：

---

政治秩序与建立和平：结束亚齐冲突

摘要为什么2005年的《赫尔辛基协定》导致亚齐实现和平，而2000年的人道主义暂停和2002年的《停止敌对行动协定》却陷入困境？本文认为，绝对的自由建设和平方法导致了敌对行动的停止以及随后印度尼西亚省的和平。亚齐的冲突终止以从战时政治秩序向和平时期秩序的过渡为前提。从战时到和平时期的政治秩序的转变需要在冲突期间安抚和重新谈判顾客，寻租特权和社会等级制度。亚齐冲突的结束导致战时精英对该省政治经济的控制永久化。