ABSTRACT In response to Viktor Chrakovskij (2015; 2018), this paper contributes to the discussion about the theoretical model of Russian verbal aspect, i.e. whether it should be considered an inflectional or derivational (classifying) category. Inter alia, the regularity of secondary imperfectivation as a specific (and unique) morphological mechanism of aspectual derivation is verified based on the example of prefixal Russian verbs with the prefixes pro- and u- found in the Russian National Corpus and on the Russian-language Internet, using Yandex and Google search engines. In addition, I discuss the phenomenon of lexicalization (degrammaticalization) as a possible constraint on standard secondary imperfectivation of Russian verbs and offer arguments to refute the criticism of the inflectional model of Russian aspect.

中文翻译：

---

Проблемы теоретического описания русского вида как словоизменительной категории: реальные и емнии

摘要 针对 Viktor Chrakovskij (2015; 2018)，本文有助于讨论俄语语言方面的理论模型，即是否应将其视为屈折或派生（分类）类别。尤其是，基于在俄罗斯国家语料库和俄语中发现的带有前缀 pro- 和 u- 的前缀俄语动词的例子，验证了作为方面派生的特定（和独特）形态机制的二次未完成化的规律性。互联网，使用 Yandex 和 Google 搜索引擎。此外，我讨论了词汇化（degrammaticalization）现象作为对俄语动词标准二级不完美的可能约束，并提供了反驳对俄语体屈折模型的批评的论据。