当前位置: X-MOL 学术Scandinavian Journal of History › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Stretching the Rule of Law: How the Norwegian resistance movement influenced the provisional treason decrees of the exile government, 1944-1945
Scandinavian Journal of History Pub Date : 2020-06-16 , DOI: 10.1080/03468755.2020.1762724
Baard Herman Borge 1 , Lars-Erik Vaale 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT This article examines the role of the Norwegian resistance movement ‘Hjemmefronten’ (the Home Front, HF) as a political interest group during the exile government’s formulation of provisional laws meant for the postwar reckoning with Norwegian collaborators and foreign war criminals. The article argues that the resistance through its judicial committee in Oslo had a decisive impact on the final versions of three decrees that, though constitutionally contested, formed most of the legal basis for the judicial settlement after 1945. It is shown how the intervention of the HF in the legislative process during 1944 and 1945 exacerbated the constitutional difficulties associated with the penal decrees passed in London. Compared to other Western European countries occupied by Nazi Germany the influence of the resistance over the wording of treason laws almost certainly is unique.

中文翻译:

延伸法治:挪威抵抗运动如何影响流亡政府的临时叛国法令,1944-1945

摘要 本文考察了挪威抵抗运动“Hjemmefronten”(家庭阵线,HF)在流亡政府制定旨在与挪威合作者和外国战犯进行战后清算的临时法律期间作为政治利益集团的作用。文章认为,奥斯陆司法委员会的抵制对三项法令的最终版本产生了决定性影响,尽管在宪法上存在争议,但这些法令构成了 1945 年后司法解决的大部分法律基础。 1944 年和 1945 年立法过程中的 HF 加剧了与伦敦通过的刑事法令相关的宪法困难。
更新日期:2020-06-16
down
wechat
bug