The article analyzes the initial stages of the shaping of design. Like the situation when the shaping of science was preceded by the emergence of methodology, a similar process had been taking place in this domain: First, methodological studies aimed at the forming of design thought made their appearance and then—on their basis—design as an independent sphere of activity and practice began to take shape. The article analyzes the methodological principles of design (the principles of correspondence, of economy, of optimum, etc.) formulated by Alexander Vladimirovich Rosenberg, demonstrating that, in his suggestions, he was drawing not only on his vision of the design experience available at the time but also on the ideas of Alexander Bogdanov’s Tectology—primarily the organizational and systemic ones. The author reveals certain particulars of the shaping of design: the role of prerequisites of its emergence, the significance of methodological research, the impact of Bogdanov’s Tectology. Furthermore, the author formulates the hypothesis of the two languages (systemic and systemic-objective) describing design and intellectual practices of similar complexity.

中文翻译：

---

俄罗斯设计方法论的塑造：亚历山大·博格达诺夫（Alexander Bogdanov）和亚历山大·罗森伯格（Alexander Rosenberg）

本文分析了设计成形的初始阶段。就像在方法形成之前先进行科学塑造的情况一样，在这一领域也发生了类似的过程：首先，旨在形成设计思想的方法学研究应运而生，然后在其基础上将设计作为一个独立的活动和实践领域开始形成。本文分析了亚历山大·弗拉基米罗维奇·罗森伯格（Alexander Vladimirovich Rosenberg）提出的设计方法论原理（对应性，经济性，最优性等原则），表明他的建议不仅是借鉴了他对可从中获得的设计经验的观点。时间，但同时也涉及亚历山大·博格达诺夫（Alexander Bogdanov）的Tectology思想-主要是组织思想和系统思想。作者揭示了设计造型的某些特殊之处：设计出现的先决条件的作用，方法学研究的重要性，博格达诺夫（Bogdanov）的学说的影响。此外，作者提出了两种语言（系统性和系统性目标）的假设，描述了具有相似复杂性的设计和智力实践。