This issue commemorates the beginning of our eleventh year of publication. I express my gratitude to my companions who have found their ways intersected with Comparative and Continental Philosophy. I offer my deep thanks to Jason M. Wirth and Michael Schwartz, my esteemed co-founders of this journal, who are more than just collaborators; they are dear friends who have changed the countenance of philosophy through our many collaborations together and with others. And to Harriette Grissom, who has made the prose of our authors, and especially my own, flow more easily and elegantly, I am most grateful. From the beginning, sometimes working gratis, she has always been there when needed and has always been valued and most appreciated. As we evolved, Andrew K. Whitehead emerged as an indispensable organizational force in the operations of Comparative and Continental Philosophy, and he carries the torch of our projects along with his own, bringing light into philosophy’s future. Later, Sarah Flavel joined our ranks bringing her valued skills to our operations as well. Our Advisory and Editorial Boards comprise some of the best and most interesting thinkers in Continental and Comparative Philosophy. The landscape of philosophy has changed only for the better because of them. The many anonymous reviewers are crucial to our success in producing a journal of the highest quality by way of its inclusivity and creativity – one that pushes the limits imposed on us by the old god of standardized philosophy, a god who casts a steady gaze that has excluded so many others, in spite of the differences among its own adherents. This old god, who remains relatively fixed in the region of the not-yet-gone, still reigns in dire determination, defying its own death until the very last; this god who proclaimed philosophy’s only origin was in Greece – the isolated place of Greece without any influence coming from distant lands such as India. The old god’s grip still has its hold on us. Despite philosophy’s many distinct differences, this god proclaimed Western philosophy as the only true philosophy, and proposed that all those other distant places of profound insight and thoughtful analyses were, at best, nothing but settings for what it would call the “wisdom traditions.” And these wisdom traditions were seen as devoid of any philosophical import, worthy only for religious considerations. Even Nietzsche, that great avatar and incarnate teacher of so many of us, avowed in his “New battles” in the Gay Science that...

中文翻译：

---

古神之死：与狄俄尼索斯的海豚一起游泳，与湿婆共舞

本期是为了纪念我们出版的第十一个年头。我感谢我的同伴们发现他们的方法与比较哲学和大陆哲学相交。我深深地感谢 Jason M. Wirth 和 Michael Schwartz，我尊敬的这本期刊的联合创始人，他们不仅仅是合作者；他们是亲爱的朋友，通过我们与他人的许多合作，改变了哲学的面貌。对于 Harriette Grissom，她让我们的作者，尤其是我自己的散文变得更加轻松和优雅，我非常感激。从一开始，有时免费工作，她总是在需要的时候出现，并且一直受到重视和最欣赏。随着我们的发展，Andrew K. 怀特黑德成为比较哲学和欧陆哲学运作中不可或缺的组织力量，他与自己一起扛起了我们项目的火炬，为哲学的未来带来光明。后来，Sarah Flavel 加入了我们的行列，将她宝贵的技能也带到了我们的运营中。我们的顾问和编辑委员会由大陆哲学和比较哲学领域的一些最优秀和最有趣的思想家组成。因为他们，哲学的风景才变得更好。许多匿名审稿人对于我们通过其包容性和创造力成功制作出最高质量的期刊至关重要 - 一个推动标准化哲学的旧神强加给我们的极限的神，一个投出稳定凝视的神排除了很多其他人，尽管它自己的追随者之间存在分歧。这位仍然相对固定在尚未消失的领域的老神，仍然以可怕的决心统治着自己的死亡，直到最后；这位宣称哲学唯一起源的神是在希腊——希腊与世隔绝的地方，没有来自印度等遥远国度的任何影响。旧神的魔掌仍然控制着我们。尽管哲学有许多明显的差异，但这位上帝宣称西方哲学是唯一真正的哲学，并提出所有其他具有深刻洞察力和深思熟虑分析的遥远地方充其量只是所谓的“智慧传统”的背景。并且这些智慧传统被视为没有任何哲学意义，仅值得用于宗教考虑。即使是尼采，